Prosty benchmark hostingów

[Gość patrick]

Test #1 completed in 46 ms.
Test #2 completed in 44 ms.
Test #3 completed in 45 ms.
Test #4 completed in 45 ms.
Test #5 completed in 44 ms.
Test #6 completed in 61 ms.
Test #7 completed in 43 ms.
Test #8 completed in 44 ms.
Test #9 completed in 89 ms.
Test #10 completed in 47 ms.
Test #11 completed in 44 ms.
Test #12 completed in 44 ms.

Lowest time: 43 ms , Highest time : 89 ms
Average of all 12 times: 50 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 46 ms

Litespeed+php-5.2.2

 

Ale te wyniki na moje oko nie odzwierciedlają wydajności serwera.

[Gamsiu 1]

Testy z godziny 20:30

 

risp.pl

 

Lowest time: 134 ms , Highest time : 193 ms
 Average of all 12 times: 156 ms
 Average of middle 10 times: 155 ms

 

xxl-web.com

 

Lowest time: 110 ms , Highest time : 204 ms
 Average of all 12 times: 133 ms
 Average of middle 10 times: 128 ms

 

nazwa.pl

 

Lowest time: 108 ms , Highest time : 192 ms
 Average of all 12 times: 147 ms
 Average of middle 10 times: 146 ms

 

nazwa.pl #2 (inne konto)

 

Lowest time: 126 ms , Highest time : 733 ms
 Average of all 12 times: 308 ms
 Average of middle 10 times: 283 ms

 

Dreamhost

 

Lowest time: 60 ms , Highest time : 108 ms
 Average of all 12 times: 75 ms
 Average of middle 10 times: 73 ms

[bobeq 0]

Progreso p11

Test #1 completed in 407 ms.
Test #2 completed in 145 ms.
Test #3 completed in 147 ms.
Test #4 completed in 154 ms.
Test #5 completed in 144 ms.
Test #6 completed in 212 ms.
Test #7 completed in 140 ms.
Test #8 completed in 142 ms.
Test #9 completed in 272 ms.
Test #10 completed in 210 ms.
Test #11 completed in 151 ms.
Test #12 completed in 291 ms.

Lowest time: 140 ms , Highest time : 407 ms
Average of all 12 times: 201 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 187 ms

[Tomasz Fiedoruk 98]

progreso.pl p9

 

Pierwszy przebieg:

Test #1 completed in 319 ms.
Test #2 completed in 285 ms.
Test #3 completed in 246 ms.
Test #4 completed in 147 ms.
Test #5 completed in 147 ms.
Test #6 completed in 149 ms.
Test #7 completed in 161 ms.
Test #8 completed in 164 ms.
Test #9 completed in 145 ms.
Test #10 completed in 192 ms.
Test #11 completed in 151 ms.
Test #12 completed in 176 ms.

Lowest time: 145 ms , Highest time : 319 ms
Average of all 12 times: 190 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 182 ms

 

Drugi przebieg:

Test #1 completed in 267 ms.
Test #2 completed in 146 ms.
Test #3 completed in 154 ms.
Test #4 completed in 146 ms.
Test #5 completed in 153 ms.
Test #6 completed in 144 ms.
Test #7 completed in 146 ms.
Test #8 completed in 145 ms.
Test #9 completed in 264 ms.
Test #10 completed in 147 ms.
Test #11 completed in 269 ms.
Test #12 completed in 245 ms.

Lowest time: 144 ms , Highest time : 269 ms
Average of all 12 times: 186 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 181 ms

 

Trzeci przebieg:

Test #1 completed in 144 ms.
Test #2 completed in 147 ms.
Test #3 completed in 296 ms.
Test #4 completed in 145 ms.
Test #5 completed in 184 ms.
Test #6 completed in 263 ms.
Test #7 completed in 218 ms.
Test #8 completed in 153 ms.
Test #9 completed in 216 ms.
Test #10 completed in 265 ms.
Test #11 completed in 154 ms.
Test #12 completed in 221 ms.

Lowest time: 144 ms , Highest time : 296 ms
Average of all 12 times: 201 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 197 ms

[Gość]

p6:

Test #1 completed in 629 ms.

Test #2 completed in 388 ms.

Test #3 completed in 842 ms.

Test #4 completed in 339 ms.

Test #5 completed in 389 ms.

Test #6 completed in 250 ms.

Test #7 completed in 293 ms.

Test #8 completed in 561 ms.

Test #9 completed in 473 ms.

Test #10 completed in 390 ms.

Test #11 completed in 286 ms.

Test #12 completed in 197 ms.

 

Lowest time: 197 ms , Highest time : 842 ms

Average of all 12 times: 420 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 400 ms

 

ale mieliśmy poczekać do "po weekendzie", więc zapuścimy to jutro : )

[CinkowskiW 0]

P7

 

Test #1 completed in 125 ms.

Test #2 completed in 99 ms.

Test #3 completed in 101 ms.

Test #4 completed in 99 ms.

Test #5 completed in 114 ms.

Test #6 completed in 103 ms.

Test #7 completed in 449 ms.

Test #8 completed in 544 ms.

Test #9 completed in 166 ms.

Test #10 completed in 111 ms.

Test #11 completed in 661 ms.

Test #12 completed in 116 ms.

 

Lowest time: 99 ms , Highest time : 661 ms

Average of all 12 times: 224 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 193 ms

 

Bardziej mnie wkurza to, że serwer ma "czkawki" w ładowaniu strony (pisałem o tym na HelpDesk- powiedzieli że będą to monitorować). Strony ładują się przyzwoicie, jednak co jakiś czas serwer(kilka/kilkanaście minut) nie odpowiada(bardzo długo próbuje się załadować) i wyskakuje brak strony lub po 10 sekundach wreszcie łąduje się.

 

Zrobiłęm pewien test - w tym samym czasie gdy serwer ładuje strone (tak długo) - w drugiej zakładce spróbowałem odpalić tą samą strone - problem taki sam. Jednak gdy tą samą czynność wykonałem na drugim kompie (w czasie trwania "czkawki" na pierwszym kompie) strona się odpaliła bez problemu. Gdy przez jakiś czas korzystałem ze strony na kompie drugim, "czkawka" występowała także na nim.

 

Wniosek: "czkawki" występują na wszystkich kompach, niezależnie od przeglądarki - jednak nie występują o tej samej porze. Wygląda mi to na reakcje firewall'a. Jednego kompa wywala, drugiego nie - chociaż specjalistą od tego nie jestem i nie mi to oceniać.

 

Problem tych "czkawek" bardzo mnie irytuje i bym był nawet skłonny zmienić operatora - jednak poczekam do końca okresu, mam nadzieje to poprawią - bo rozstanie z Extranetem i dobrymi serwerami będzie bolesne (nie patrząć na czkawki). Wierze w ekipe Progreso - pewnie za niedługo pokażą klase rozwiązując ten problem. Zazwyczaj moje problemy rozwiązywali wyśmienicie .

[Tomasz Fiedoruk 98]

progreso.pl p9

 

1:

Test #1 completed in 318 ms.
Test #2 completed in 144 ms.
Test #3 completed in 147 ms.
Test #4 completed in 144 ms.
Test #5 completed in 146 ms.
Test #6 completed in 166 ms.
Test #7 completed in 144 ms.
Test #8 completed in 144 ms.
Test #9 completed in 145 ms.
Test #10 completed in 144 ms.
Test #11 completed in 146 ms.
Test #12 completed in 143 ms.

Lowest time: 143 ms , Highest time : 318 ms
Average of all 12 times: 161 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 147 ms

2:

Test #1 completed in 145 ms.
Test #2 completed in 144 ms.
Test #3 completed in 144 ms.
Test #4 completed in 145 ms.
Test #5 completed in 144 ms.
Test #6 completed in 153 ms.
Test #7 completed in 144 ms.
Test #8 completed in 144 ms.
Test #9 completed in 145 ms.
Test #10 completed in 144 ms.
Test #11 completed in 146 ms.
Test #12 completed in 152 ms.

Lowest time: 144 ms , Highest time : 153 ms
Average of all 12 times: 146 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 145 ms

3:

Test #1 completed in 156 ms.
Test #2 completed in 144 ms.
Test #3 completed in 227 ms.
Test #4 completed in 144 ms.
Test #5 completed in 145 ms.
Test #6 completed in 143 ms.
Test #7 completed in 144 ms.
Test #8 completed in 144 ms.
Test #9 completed in 144 ms.
Test #10 completed in 145 ms.
Test #11 completed in 145 ms.
Test #12 completed in 145 ms.

Lowest time: 143 ms , Highest time : 227 ms
Average of all 12 times: 152 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 146 ms

 

Z maila, który otrzymałem wynika, że serwery zostały odciążone i powinno już być ok

[bald 0]

progreso.pl p9

 

Z maila, który otrzymałem wynika, że serwery zostały odciążone i powinno już być ok

 

ja stawialbym raczej na zmiane ustawien konkretnie "pod ten program testujacy"

[WoofeR 0]

ja stawialbym raczej na zmiane ustawien konkretnie "pod ten program testujacy"

 

Poczekajmy na oficjalne stanowisko w tej sprawie. Tylko przypomnę:

 

Po weekendzie napiszemy wiekszy wspolny post nt. tego testu / szybkosci naszych maszyn.

 

Na deser powiem tylko, ze *wlaczenie* eAcceleratora (czyli defakto przyspieszacza) powoduje *wydluzenie* wykonywania tego benchmarka o ok. 150ms. Reszta po weekendzie

pozdr.

[Gość]

Ja też miewam czkawki, tzn. na stronkach na progreso.. że np. wgrywa się strona, ale bez 1/3 obrazków.. reszta "parę sekund później" albo nawet paręnaście...

[Gość RuFiK]

progreso @ p16

czyli dalej to samo

 

Test #1 completed in 142 ms.

Test #2 completed in 143 ms.

Test #3 completed in 146 ms.

Test #4 completed in 141 ms.

Test #5 completed in 139 ms.

Test #6 completed in 138 ms.

Test #7 completed in 138 ms.

 

Lowest time: 138 ms , Highest time : 146 ms

Average of all 7 times: 141 ms

Average of middle 5 times: 141 ms

[miz 0]

1. Chyba tylko w tym

2. Zrób test o innych porach. Wątpię aby były podobne wyniki

 

Test na i365 wczoraj z 19 (robie sobie co godzinke z crona i zapsiuje ):

Test #1 completed in 61 ms.

Test #2 completed in 70 ms.

Test #3 completed in 61 ms.

Test #4 completed in 62 ms.

Test #5 completed in 65 ms.

Test #6 completed in 61 ms.

Test #7 completed in 62 ms.

Test #8 completed in 66 ms.

Test #9 completed in 65 ms.

Test #10 completed in 61 ms.

Test #11 completed in 60 ms.

Test #12 completed in 61 ms.

 

Lowest time: 60 ms , Highest time : 70 ms

Average of all 12 times: 63 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 63 ms

 

 

 

coz, jakies 5 razy lepiej niz progreso.. Za to gorzej niz IQ (tam mam 45-50 ms).

[Tomasz Fiedoruk 98]

dreamhost.com

 

/ spodziewałem się co najmniej 500ms a tu proszę jeden wynik -32ms - to chyba Chuck hehe /

 

Test #1 completed in 59 ms.
Test #2 completed in 58 ms.
Test #3 completed in 57 ms.
Test #4 completed in 58 ms.
Test #5 completed in 58 ms.
Test #6 completed in 58 ms.
Test #7 completed in 59 ms.
Test #8 completed in 59 ms.
Test #9 completed in -32 ms.
Test #10 completed in 59 ms.
Test #11 completed in 58 ms.
Test #12 completed in 59 ms.

Lowest time: -32 ms , Highest time : 59 ms
Average of all 12 times: 51 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 58 ms

[bald 0]

dreamhost.com

 

/ spodziewałem się co najmniej 500ms a tu proszę jeden wynik -32ms - to chyba Chuck hehe /

 

Test #1 completed in 59 ms.

 

Test #8 completed in 59 ms.

Test #9 completed in -32 ms.

 

e tam , "9" zrobil razem z "8" z nudow, typowy shared hosting

[Sebak 298]

Tak z ciekawości to ten benchmark ma różnicę w działaniu pomiędzy php4 a php5 w graniach 25 ms...

 

http://s1.x12.pl/php-benchmark.php5

http://s1.x12.pl/php-benchmark.php

 

http://s2.x12.pl/php-benchmark.php5

http://s2.x12.pl/php-benchmark.php

[Linux 0]

prohost.pl

 

Test #1 completed in 64 ms.

Test #2 completed in 69 ms.

Test #3 completed in 63 ms.

Test #4 completed in 63 ms.

Test #5 completed in 62 ms.

Test #6 completed in 62 ms.

Test #7 completed in 62 ms.

Test #8 completed in 63 ms.

Test #9 completed in 65 ms.

Test #10 completed in 65 ms.

Test #11 completed in 61 ms.

Test #12 completed in 63 ms.

 

Lowest time: 61 ms , Highest time : 69 ms

Average of all 12 times: 64 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 63 ms

[WoofeR 0]

Progreso - P9

 

PHP4:

 

Test #1 completed in 200 ms.
Test #2 completed in 144 ms.
Test #3 completed in 192 ms.
Test #4 completed in 349 ms.
Test #5 completed in 176 ms.
Test #6 completed in 145 ms.
Test #7 completed in 272 ms.
Test #8 completed in 333 ms.
Test #9 completed in 168 ms.
Test #10 completed in 144 ms.
Test #11 completed in 242 ms.
Test #12 completed in 374 ms.

Lowest time: 144 ms , Highest time : 374 ms
Average of all 12 times: 228 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 222 ms

 

 

PHP5:

 

Test #1 completed in 103 ms.
Test #2 completed in 103 ms.
Test #3 completed in 105 ms.
Test #4 completed in 103 ms.
Test #5 completed in 105 ms.
Test #6 completed in 212 ms.
Test #7 completed in 109 ms.
Test #8 completed in 103 ms.
Test #9 completed in 103 ms.
Test #10 completed in 103 ms.
Test #11 completed in 102 ms.
Test #12 completed in 103 ms.

Lowest time: 102 ms , Highest time : 212 ms
Average of all 12 times: 113 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 104 ms

[MasterNETpl 100]

Różnica między PHP4 (mod) a PHP5 (cgi) jest ogromna.

 

MasterNET.pl

 

PHP4:

Test #1 completed in 113 ms.

Test #2 completed in 163 ms.

Test #3 completed in 99 ms.

Test #4 completed in 127 ms.

Test #5 completed in 136 ms.

Test #6 completed in 123 ms.

Test #7 completed in 86 ms.

Test #8 completed in 94 ms.

Test #9 completed in 94 ms.

Test #10 completed in 185 ms.

Test #11 completed in 143 ms.

Test #12 completed in 88 ms.

PHP5:

Test #1 completed in 36 ms.

Test #2 completed in 40 ms.

Test #3 completed in 52 ms.

Test #4 completed in 38 ms.

Test #5 completed in 36 ms.

Test #6 completed in 43 ms.

Test #7 completed in 37 ms.

Test #8 completed in 54 ms.

Test #9 completed in 38 ms.

Test #10 completed in 42 ms.

Test #11 completed in 69 ms.

Test #12 completed in 36 ms.

 

PS. interesujący tasiemiec się tworzy

[beliq 442]

Test #1 completed in 40 ms.

Test #2 completed in 40 ms.

Test #3 completed in 40 ms.

Test #4 completed in 40 ms.

Test #5 completed in 40 ms.

Test #6 completed in 40 ms.

Test #7 completed in 40 ms.

Test #8 completed in 40 ms.

Test #9 completed in 40 ms.

Test #10 completed in 40 ms.

Test #11 completed in 40 ms.

Test #12 completed in 40 ms.

 

Lowest time: 40 ms , Highest time : 40 ms

Average of all 12 times: 40 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 40 ms

To moja maszyna...

Apache + PHP5(fastcgi)

[Tomasz Fiedoruk 98]

No nie, wrzuciłem skrypt w pętle a wyniki ciągle takie same.

 

http://dreamhost.com/ php5 cgi

 

Test #1 completed in 39 ms.
Test #2 completed in 39 ms.
Test #3 completed in 38 ms.
Test #4 completed in 39 ms.
Test #5 completed in 39 ms.
Test #6 completed in 39 ms.
Test #7 completed in 39 ms.
Test #8 completed in 39 ms.
Test #9 completed in 39 ms.
Test #10 completed in 39 ms.
Test #11 completed in 39 ms.
Test #12 completed in -26 ms.

Lowest time: -26 ms , Highest time : 39 ms
Average of all 12 times: 34 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 39 ms

 

Na localu nawet takich wyników nie uzyskuje Myślałem, że DH to zwykły budżetowy hosting a tu z dnia na dzień co raz lepiej i lepiej

[Noone 19]

To też się dorzucę. U mnie "normalnie":

 

Dreamhost.com, PHP 5, CGI

 

Test #1 completed in 39 ms.
Test #2 completed in 58 ms.
Test #3 completed in 39 ms.
Test #4 completed in 40 ms.
Test #5 completed in 38 ms.
Test #6 completed in 42 ms.
Test #7 completed in 38 ms.
Test #8 completed in 40 ms.
Test #9 completed in 39 ms.
Test #10 completed in 39 ms.
Test #11 completed in 38 ms.
Test #12 completed in 39 ms.

Lowest time: 38 ms , Highest time : 58 ms
Average of all 12 times: 41 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 39 ms

 

Prawie jak w KEI. Jestem naprawdę pozytywnie zaskoczony tym hostingiem.

[prat 1]

Blink.pl

Test #1 completed in 161 ms.
Test #2 completed in 209 ms.
Test #3 completed in 218 ms.
Test #4 completed in 208 ms.
Test #5 completed in 117 ms.
Test #6 completed in 148 ms.
Test #7 completed in 201 ms.
Test #8 completed in 172 ms.
Test #9 completed in 275 ms.
Test #10 completed in 168 ms.
Test #11 completed in 208 ms.
Test #12 completed in 132 ms.

Lowest time: 117 ms , Highest time : 275 ms
Average of all 12 times: 185 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 183 ms

[Gość Netarteria.pl]

Netarteria.pl

 

PHP 5, godzina 14:20

 

Test #1 completed in 33 ms.
Test #2 completed in 33 ms.
Test #3 completed in 33 ms.
Test #4 completed in 33 ms.
Test #5 completed in 33 ms.
Test #6 completed in 32 ms.
Test #7 completed in 33 ms.
Test #8 completed in 33 ms.
Test #9 completed in 33 ms.
Test #10 completed in 34 ms.
Test #11 completed in 33 ms.
Test #12 completed in 33 ms.

Lowest time: 32 ms , Highest time : 34 ms
Average of all 12 times: 33 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 33 ms

 

 

Jeszcze może mała ciekawostka, mamy w serwerowni taki mały serwer do zliczania statystyk "Celeron 466Mhz"

Uruchomiłem na nim ten test

 

PHP5

 

Test #1 completed in 287 ms.
Test #2 completed in 282 ms.
Test #3 completed in 283 ms.
Test #4 completed in 280 ms.
Test #5 completed in 283 ms.
Test #6 completed in 284 ms.
Test #7 completed in 283 ms.
Test #8 completed in 280 ms.
Test #9 completed in 300 ms.
Test #10 completed in 282 ms.
Test #11 completed in 284 ms.
Test #12 completed in 282 ms.

Lowest time: 280 ms , Highest time : 300 ms
Average of all 12 times: 284 ms
Average of middle 10 times: 283 ms

[Baernash 0]

Dziś godzina 16:10~16:12:

 

NETEASY

 

Test #1 completed in 38 ms.

Test #2 completed in 40 ms.

Test #3 completed in 39 ms.

Test #4 completed in 46 ms.

Test #5 completed in 41 ms.

Test #6 completed in 38 ms.

Test #7 completed in 38 ms.

Test #8 completed in 48 ms.

Test #9 completed in 39 ms.

Test #10 completed in 39 ms.

Test #11 completed in 39 ms.

Test #12 completed in 40 ms.

 

Lowest time: 38 ms , Highest time : 48 ms

Average of all 12 times: 40 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 40 ms

 

KEI

 

Test #1 completed in 64 ms.

Test #2 completed in 66 ms.

Test #3 completed in 64 ms.

Test #4 completed in 80 ms.

Test #5 completed in 63 ms.

Test #6 completed in 68 ms.

Test #7 completed in 65 ms.

Test #8 completed in 62 ms.

Test #9 completed in 66 ms.

Test #10 completed in 61 ms.

Test #11 completed in 65 ms.

Test #12 completed in 64 ms.

 

Lowest time: 61 ms , Highest time : 80 ms

Average of all 12 times: 66 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 65 ms

 

NAZWA

 

Test #1 completed in 94 ms.

Test #2 completed in 50 ms.

Test #3 completed in 78 ms.

Test #4 completed in 52 ms.

Test #5 completed in 82 ms.

Test #6 completed in 75 ms.

Test #7 completed in 54 ms.

Test #8 completed in 52 ms.

Test #9 completed in 66 ms.

Test #10 completed in 50 ms.

Test #11 completed in 54 ms.

Test #12 completed in 50 ms.

 

Lowest time: 50 ms , Highest time : 94 ms

Average of all 12 times: 63 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 61 ms

 

FORALL

 

Test #1 completed in 39 ms.

Test #2 completed in 45 ms.

Test #3 completed in 42 ms.

Test #4 completed in 38 ms.

Test #5 completed in 42 ms.

Test #6 completed in 39 ms.

Test #7 completed in 39 ms.

Test #8 completed in 38 ms.

Test #9 completed in 49 ms.

Test #10 completed in 40 ms.

Test #11 completed in 45 ms.

Test #12 completed in 40 ms.

 

Lowest time: 38 ms , Highest time : 49 ms

Average of all 12 times: 41 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 41 ms

[Noone 19]

Piszcie czy to CGi czy mod od razu. Bo porównanie jest nieproporcjonalne.