Prosty benchmark hostingów

[Buszmen 0]

Athlon 3800+/1gb RAM/Lighttpd

 

Lowest time: 33 ms , Highest time : 36 ms

Average of all 12 times: 33 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 33 ms

 

Tak dla porównania. Serwer jest lekko obciążony.

[foo 0]

Test #1 completed in 145 ms.

Test #2 completed in 125 ms.

Test #3 completed in 124 ms.

Test #4 completed in 123 ms.

Test #5 completed in 123 ms.

Test #6 completed in 123 ms.

Test #7 completed in 128 ms.

Test #8 completed in 122 ms.

Test #9 completed in 127 ms.

Test #10 completed in 125 ms.

Test #11 completed in 129 ms.

Test #12 completed in 126 ms.

 

Lowest time: 122 ms , Highest time : 145 ms

Average of all 12 times: 127 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 125 ms

średnio obciązony sempron w DE, litespeed, php 4.4.7

[BlueMan 69]

Jak widać każdy ma inne czasy.

Miło się to czyta, stosunkowo dobre porównanie od strony technicznej serwerów to jest.

 

 

netlook.pl ( www.BlueMan.pl )

Test #1 completed in 80 ms.

Test #2 completed in 318 ms.

Test #3 completed in 197 ms.

Test #4 completed in 104 ms.

Test #5 completed in 79 ms.

Test #6 completed in 79 ms.

Test #7 completed in 241 ms.

Test #8 completed in 161 ms.

Test #9 completed in 134 ms.

Test #10 completed in 88 ms.

Test #11 completed in 232 ms.

Test #12 completed in 133 ms.

 

Lowest time: 79 ms , Highest time : 318 ms

Average of all 12 times: 154 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 145 ms

phpinfo - http://www.blueman.pl/phpinfo.php

 

kei.pl ( www.BlueForum.pl )

Test #1 completed in 64 ms.

Test #2 completed in 62 ms.

Test #3 completed in 61 ms.

Test #4 completed in 67 ms.

Test #5 completed in 62 ms.

Test #6 completed in 62 ms.

Test #7 completed in 63 ms.

Test #8 completed in 61 ms.

Test #9 completed in 63 ms.

Test #10 completed in 72 ms.

Test #11 completed in 63 ms.

Test #12 completed in 63 ms.

 

Lowest time: 61 ms , Highest time : 72 ms

Average of all 12 times: 64 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 63 ms

phpinfo - http://www.blueforum.pl/phpinfo.php

 

masternet.pl ( przenoszę właśnie tam jeden mój serwis )

Test #1 completed in 1 ms.

Test #2 completed in 97 ms.

Test #3 completed in 247 ms.

Test #4 completed in 87 ms.

Test #5 completed in 87 ms.

Test #6 completed in 115 ms.

Test #7 completed in 179 ms.

Test #8 completed in 362 ms.

Test #9 completed in 88 ms.

Test #10 completed in 148 ms.

Test #11 completed in 154 ms.

Test #12 completed in 106 ms.

 

Lowest time: 1 ms , Highest time : 362 ms

Average of all 12 times: 139 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 131 ms

phpinfo - www.blue.masternet.pl/phpinfo.php

 

zagrosze.net ( www.web24h.org , serwer zagrosze.net.pl)

Nie polecam nawet wrogom tego serwera !!

Test #1 completed in 64 ms.

Test #2 completed in 45 ms.

Test #3 completed in 60 ms.

Test #4 completed in 73 ms.

Test #5 completed in 51 ms.

Test #6 completed in 42 ms.

Test #7 completed in 42 ms.

Test #8 completed in 42 ms.

Test #9 completed in 42 ms.

Test #10 completed in 45 ms.

Test #11 completed in 44 ms.

Test #12 completed in 64 ms.

 

Lowest time: 42 ms , Highest time : 73 ms

Average of all 12 times: 51 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 50 ms

phpinfo - www.1stweb.zagrosze.net.pl/phpinfo.php

 

 

 

Najbardziej dziwne są skoki - od 80 do 400 ms :|

[Linux 0]

PIII 730MHZ 256 RAM ( procek idle ram 30% )

PHP 5.2.0-8 + Lighttpd

 

Test #1 completed in 196 ms.

Test #2 completed in 196 ms.

Test #3 completed in 196 ms.

Test #4 completed in 196 ms.

Test #5 completed in 198 ms.

Test #6 completed in 197 ms.

Test #7 completed in 197 ms.

Test #8 completed in 197 ms.

Test #9 completed in 197 ms.

Test #10 completed in 196 ms.

Test #11 completed in 195 ms.

Test #12 completed in 197 ms.

 

Lowest time: 195 ms , Highest time : 198 ms

Average of all 12 times: 197 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 197 ms

[Kamil01 0]

Athlon 3700+, 1Gb ram

 

obciazenie podczas wykonywania testu:2.04, php4(mod):

 

Test #1 completed in 118 ms.

Test #2 completed in 77 ms.

Test #3 completed in 77 ms.

Test #4 completed in 74 ms.

Test #5 completed in 86 ms.

Test #6 completed in 93 ms.

Test #7 completed in 84 ms.

Test #8 completed in 109 ms.

Test #9 completed in 72 ms.

Test #10 completed in 96 ms.

Test #11 completed in 74 ms.

Test #12 completed in 88 ms.

 

 

Obciązenie podczas wykonywania testu:1.24, php5(cgi):

 

Test #1 completed in 75 ms.

Test #2 completed in 78 ms.

Test #3 completed in 74 ms.

Test #4 completed in 74 ms.

Test #5 completed in 75 ms.

Test #6 completed in 74 ms.

Test #7 completed in 75 ms.

Test #8 completed in 87 ms.

Test #9 completed in 100 ms.

Test #10 completed in 96 ms.

Test #11 completed in 78 ms.

Test #12 completed in 74 ms.

 

 

Pozdro

[Yagadoor 0]

insane.pl (in5.pl)

 

Test #1 completed in 35 ms.

Test #2 completed in 36 ms.

Test #3 completed in 36 ms.

Test #4 completed in 37 ms.

Test #5 completed in 36 ms.

Test #6 completed in 36 ms.

Test #7 completed in 35 ms.

Test #8 completed in 35 ms.

Test #9 completed in 35 ms.

Test #10 completed in 35 ms.

Test #11 completed in 35 ms.

Test #12 completed in 35 ms.

 

easyisp.pl

 

Test #1 completed in 168 ms.

Test #2 completed in 102 ms.

Test #3 completed in 101 ms.

Test #4 completed in 196 ms.

Test #5 completed in 90 ms.

Test #6 completed in 166 ms.

Test #7 completed in 153 ms.

Test #8 completed in 87 ms.

Test #9 completed in 85 ms.

Test #10 completed in 92 ms.

Test #11 completed in 93 ms.

Test #12 completed in 94 ms.

 

ixwebhosting.com

 

Test #1 completed in 64 ms.

Test #2 completed in 64 ms.

Test #3 completed in 92 ms.

Test #4 completed in 63 ms.

Test #5 completed in 63 ms.

Test #6 completed in 63 ms.

Test #7 completed in 71 ms.

Test #8 completed in 64 ms.

Test #9 completed in 64 ms.

Test #10 completed in 65 ms.

Test #11 completed in 64 ms.

Test #12 completed in 73 ms.

 

localhost (C2D E6300@default, 1GB RAM)

 

Test #1 completed in 47 ms.

Test #2 completed in 48 ms.

Test #3 completed in 48 ms.

Test #4 completed in 47 ms.

Test #5 completed in 49 ms.

Test #6 completed in 48 ms.

Test #7 completed in 50 ms.

Test #8 completed in 48 ms.

Test #9 completed in 51 ms.

Test #10 completed in 47 ms.

Test #11 completed in 47 ms.

Test #12 completed in 48 ms.

[Litr 0]

Mam dobrą wiadomość: nie przedłużam abonamentu, więc Progreso ma mnie z głowy i święty spokój Prawdopodobnie przeniosę się do IQ.pl

 

 

Bardzo dobry wybor z tym IQ.pl. Jestem u nich od konca pazdziernika ubieglego roku. Jak dla mnie rewelacja.

 

 

 

O moich przeprawach z progreso.pl - z wydajnoscia ich sprzetu (z czasem generowania strony a wlasciwie forum) nie mam juz zamiaru tutaj pisac.

[Pluton 0]

Witam,

 

Nawiązując do powyższych wypowiedzi oraz zestawień czasów otrzymanych w wyniku testu skryptem php-benchmark.php, myślę iż nie można jednoznacznie opierać się jedynie na szybkości wykonania skryptu php przy ocenianiu konkretnego dostawcy usług hostingowych. Proszę zauważyć, przykładowo gdy "trochę zaoszczędzimy" na czasie wykonania poleceń interpretera php może okazać się, że zostanie sumarycznie "stracone" w skutek wolnego/przeciążonego serwera SQL obsługujące zapytania do bazy danych.

Dla przykładu mogę przytoczyć: o ile czasy ww. skryptu na moich kontach w proste.pl oraz home.pl są zbliżone o tyle szykość generowania poszczególnych zapytań SQL /na moich obu kontach/ są niekiedy ponad kilkudziesięciokrotnie lepsze na korzyść home.pl. Nie mniej oba hostingi oceniam bardzo dobrze.

Wszystko zależy od tego co nam jest potrzebne /szybki sql, php, a może większe znaczenia ma na przykład dostęp z zewnątrz do serwera mysql, etc./.

 

Pozdrawiam

[Przemysław 0]

polserwer.pl (php5 CGI):

Test #1 completed in 48 ms.

Test #2 completed in 45 ms.

Test #3 completed in 49 ms.

Test #4 completed in 42 ms.

Test #5 completed in 51 ms.

Test #6 completed in 61 ms.

Test #7 completed in 61 ms.

Test #8 completed in 44 ms.

Test #9 completed in 44 ms.

Test #10 completed in 42 ms.

Test #11 completed in 49 ms.

Test #12 completed in 48 ms.

 

Lowest time: 42 ms , Highest time : 61 ms

Average of all 12 times: 49 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 48 ms

[Gość RuFiK]

Wyniki z i365.pl (które według wielu opinii jest podobno fatalne) biją o głowę te z progreso (mam konto singleserver na dawnym s9):

 

Test #1 completed in 61 ms.

Test #2 completed in 106 ms.

Test #3 completed in 70 ms.

Test #4 completed in 60 ms.

Test #5 completed in 66 ms.

Test #6 completed in 63 ms.

Test #7 completed in 66 ms.

Test #8 completed in 63 ms.

Test #9 completed in 81 ms.

Test #10 completed in 60 ms.

Test #11 completed in 62 ms.

Test #12 completed in 63 ms.

 

Lowest time: 60 ms , Highest time : 106 ms

Average of all 12 times: 68 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 66 ms

 

i365.pl to deep szit i tyle ... ( sorka za wyrazenie, ale to szczere słowa, tym bardziej ze przed chwila padł sv10 i365.pl = banda zgredów ..

 

a wracajac do tematu hmm lekko zszokowany jestem !

 

serwer p16 @ progreso.pl

 

I badanie

 

Test #1 completed in 139 ms.

Test #2 completed in 138 ms.

Test #3 completed in 139 ms.

Test #4 completed in 139 ms.

Test #5 completed in 139 ms.

Test #6 completed in 138 ms.

Test #7 completed in 137 ms.

Test #8 completed in 139 ms.

Test #9 completed in 140 ms.

Test #10 completed in 138 ms.

Test #11 completed in 140 ms.

Test #12 completed in 140 ms.

 

Lowest time: 137 ms , Highest time : 140 ms

Average of all 12 times: 139 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 139 ms

II badanie

 

Test #1 completed in 137 ms.

Test #2 completed in 139 ms.

Test #3 completed in 141 ms.

Test #4 completed in 138 ms.

Test #5 completed in 139 ms.

Test #6 completed in 139 ms.

Test #7 completed in 139 ms.

Test #8 completed in 140 ms.

Test #9 completed in 150 ms.

Test #10 completed in 140 ms.

Test #11 completed in 137 ms.

Test #12 completed in 138 ms.

 

Lowest time: 137 ms , Highest time : 150 ms

Average of all 12 times: 140 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 139 ms

[Tomasz Fiedoruk 98]

p9 progreso.pl

 

Free PHP Benchmark Performance Script

 

Test #1 completed in 152 ms.

Test #2 completed in 151 ms.

Test #3 completed in 144 ms.

Test #4 completed in 181 ms.

Test #5 completed in 167 ms.

Test #6 completed in 164 ms.

Test #7 completed in 157 ms.

Test #8 completed in 145 ms.

Test #9 completed in 145 ms.

Test #10 completed in 144 ms.

Test #11 completed in 146 ms.

Test #12 completed in 144 ms.

 

Lowest time: 144 ms , Highest time : 181 ms

Average of all 12 times: 153 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 152 ms

 

//

 

Chyba chłopakom udało się odciążyć maszyny

[bald 0]

p9 progreso.pl

 

Chyba chłopakom udało się odciążyć maszyny

 

nie ma sie co podniecac, o tej porze to sie maszyny "same" odciazaja

[Gość RuFiK]

jeszcze raz p16 @ progreso.pl

wynik ten sam ...

 

Test #1 completed in 140 ms.

Test #2 completed in 233 ms.

Test #3 completed in 142 ms.

Test #4 completed in 146 ms.

Test #5 completed in 606 ms.

Test #6 completed in 138 ms.

Test #7 completed in 139 ms.

Test #8 completed in 146 ms.

Test #9 completed in 142 ms.

Test #10 completed in 138 ms.

Test #11 completed in 145 ms.

Test #12 completed in 141 ms.

[Tripix 0]

p8.progreso.pl

 

test1

Test #1 completed in 175 ms.

Test #2 completed in 152 ms.

Test #3 completed in 140 ms.

Test #4 completed in 366 ms.

Test #5 completed in 464 ms.

Test #6 completed in 122 ms.

Test #7 completed in 130 ms.

Test #8 completed in 99 ms.

Test #9 completed in 235 ms.

Test #10 completed in 153 ms.

Test #11 completed in 105 ms.

Test #12 completed in 107 ms.

 

test2

Test #1 completed in 240 ms.

Test #2 completed in 162 ms.

Test #3 completed in 188 ms.

Test #4 completed in 440 ms.

Test #5 completed in 288 ms.

Test #6 completed in 646 ms.

Test #7 completed in 1 ms.

Test #8 completed in 119 ms.

Test #9 completed in 339 ms.

Test #10 completed in 547 ms.

Test #11 completed in 195 ms.

Test #12 completed in 101 ms.

 

Ogólnie jak jest widać - kiepsko, ale tragedii nie ma. Poza tym jeśli chodzi o działanie serwisów to nie jest to bardzo odczuwalne. Trochę natomiast boli fakt, że inne czołowe firmy mają stale ~50-100, a progreso to nie krzak i ceny też "nie krzakowe", więc wymagałoby się wyników podobnych do innych znanych firm.

[bald 0]

p8.progreso.pl

 

test1

test2

Ogólnie jak jest widać - kiepsko, ale tragedii nie ma. Poza tym jeśli chodzi o działanie serwisów to nie jest to bardzo odczuwalne. Trochę natomiast boli fakt, że inne czołowe firmy mają stale ~50-100, a progreso to nie krzak i ceny też "nie krzakowe", więc wymagałoby się wyników podobnych do innych znanych firm.

 

 

firma zmienia cos wtedy gdy pojawiaja sie jakies "zle objawy" dla samej firmy

 

na chwile obecna nie maja zadnego powodu aby cos zmieniac, wiec nie licz na to ze samo z siebie sie cos zmieni na lepsze

 

jesli by stalo sie tak iz klienci zaczeli by masowo rezygnowac z ich uslug przez "wolne dzialanie" wtedy firma miala by powod do wprowadzania jakichs zmian

[karoldz 0]

Nie wydaje mi się aby można się było kierować tylko tym testem bo chyba nie najlepiej pokazuje jak działa serwer, nie chce wymieniać nazw hostingów ale odpaliłem ten test na koncie z którego jestem zadowolony strony się wczytują bardzo szybko i odpaliłem ten skrypt na hostingu z którego jestem nie zadowolony kompletnie i go nie używam bo strony czasami się w ogóle nie ładowały i na tym lepszym miałem 120 ms a na tym badziewiu (nie tylko ja tak uważam jest parę wątków na forum) czas generacji to 25 ms. Więc nie wiem co o tym myśleć.

[bald 0]

Nie wydaje mi się aby można się było kierować tylko tym testem ...

 

 

test jak test, to tylko narzedzie, mniej lub bardziej wiarygodne

faktem jest ze w pewien sposob obrazuje szybkosc dzialania serwera i tylko o to chodzi o porownanie mniej-wiecej realnych wartosci

 

co do omawianej firmy to nie bez powodu zwrot: wolne dzialanie, ujalem w cudzyslow

[pixel 0]

jesli ktos chce porownac to zapuscilem skrypt na swoim serwerze w nazwa.pl - mam go od sierpnia 2006

 

Test #1 completed in 131 ms.

Test #2 completed in 71 ms.

Test #3 completed in 71 ms.

Test #4 completed in 115 ms.

Test #5 completed in 119 ms.

Test #6 completed in 76 ms.

Test #7 completed in 71 ms.

Test #8 completed in 100 ms.

Test #9 completed in 75 ms.

Test #10 completed in 70 ms.

Test #11 completed in 89 ms.

Test #12 completed in 71 ms.

 

Lowest time: 70 ms , Highest time : 131 ms

Average of all 12 times: 88 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 86 ms

 

 

dla porownania progreso p6

Test #1 completed in 188 ms.

Test #2 completed in 188 ms.

Test #3 completed in 188 ms.

Test #4 completed in 192 ms.

Test #5 completed in 270 ms.

Test #6 completed in 259 ms.

Test #7 completed in 197 ms.

Test #8 completed in 188 ms.

Test #9 completed in 188 ms.

Test #10 completed in 397 ms.

Test #11 completed in 188 ms.

Test #12 completed in 835 ms.

 

Lowest time: 188 ms , Highest time : 835 ms

Average of all 12 times: 273 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 226 ms

[Tomasz Fiedoruk 98]

17:10 Duży ruch:

 

Test #1 completed in 160 ms.

Test #2 completed in 145 ms.

Test #3 completed in 144 ms.

Test #4 completed in 148 ms.

Test #5 completed in 146 ms.

Test #6 completed in 147 ms.

Test #7 completed in 146 ms.

Test #8 completed in 165 ms.

Test #9 completed in 145 ms.

Test #10 completed in 163 ms.

Test #11 completed in 242 ms.

Test #12 completed in 228 ms.

 

Lowest time: 144 ms , Highest time : 242 ms

Average of all 12 times: 165 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 159 ms

[Gość]

home.pl było?

 

godzina 17:44:

 

Test #1 completed in 45 ms.

Test #2 completed in 45 ms.

Test #3 completed in 44 ms.

Test #4 completed in 39 ms.

Test #5 completed in 46 ms.

Test #6 completed in 46 ms.

Test #7 completed in 43 ms.

Test #8 completed in 39 ms.

Test #9 completed in 53 ms.

Test #10 completed in 45 ms.

Test #11 completed in 40 ms.

Test #12 completed in 45 ms.

 

Lowest time: 39 ms , Highest time : 53 ms

Average of all 12 times: 44 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 44 ms

 

 

EDIT:

 

A było.. sorry ale niech już zostanie..

 

do tego progreso p6 po 18tej:

 

Free PHP Benchmark Performance Script

 

Test #1 completed in 189 ms.

Test #2 completed in 189 ms.

Test #3 completed in 282 ms.

Test #4 completed in 189 ms.

Test #5 completed in 232 ms.

Test #6 completed in 224 ms.

Test #7 completed in 190 ms.

Test #8 completed in 200 ms.

Test #9 completed in 194 ms.

Test #10 completed in 481 ms.

Test #11 completed in 188 ms.

Test #12 completed in 547 ms.

 

Lowest time: 188 ms , Highest time : 547 ms

Average of all 12 times: 259 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 237 ms

 

sporo, co? : )

[bald 0]

sporo, co? : )

 

pocieszeniem moze byc to, ze nie wazne o jakiej porze zawsze jest tak samo wolno

[Gość adamszendzielorz]

pocieszeniem moze byc to, ze nie wazne o jakiej porze zawsze jest tak samo wolno

 

Po weekendzie napiszemy wiekszy wspolny post nt. tego testu / szybkosci naszych maszyn.

 

Na deser powiem tylko, ze *wlaczenie* eAcceleratora (czyli defakto przyspieszacza) powoduje *wydluzenie* wykonywania tego benchmarka o ok. 150ms. Reszta po weekendzie

pozdr.

[Gość]

Będą DELLe!! HURRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAA..... ; - )))))))))))

[bald 0]

Po weekendzie napiszemy wiekszy wspolny post nt. tego testu / szybkosci naszych maszyn.

 

Na deser powiem tylko, ze *wlaczenie* eAcceleratora (czyli defakto przyspieszacza) powoduje *wydluzenie* wykonywania tego benchmarka o ok. 150ms. Reszta po weekendzie

pozdr.

 

 

nie chodzi o wydajnosc benchmarka bo tak naprawde moze to byc ostatnia "kupa" chodzi raczej o to iz zapuszczony IDENTYCZNY tester na ROZNYCH maszynach daje wyniki ktore daja do myslenia

 

zeby nie bylo nie domowien, jestem zadowolony z obslugi w progreso

 

 

 

Będą DELLe!! HURRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAA..... ; - )))))))))))

 

piszac "DELLe" masz na mysli kasowanie kont zbyt obciazajacych serwery ?

<nmsp><rotfl>

[Max 0]

mój średnioobciążony VPS w stanach z eAcceleratorem:

 

Test #1 completed in 165 ms.

Test #2 completed in 131 ms.

Test #3 completed in 121 ms.

Test #4 completed in 122 ms.

Test #5 completed in 310 ms.

Test #6 completed in 139 ms.

Test #7 completed in 125 ms.

Test #8 completed in 122 ms.

Test #9 completed in 123 ms.

Test #10 completed in 123 ms.

Test #11 completed in 124 ms.

Test #12 completed in 125 ms.

 

Lowest time: 121 ms , Highest time : 310 ms

Average of all 12 times: 144 ms

Average of middle 10 times: 130 ms